A Database of Drosophila Genes & Genomes

FB2008_07, released August 8, 2008
 

Allele Dmel\Fmr1Δ50M

General Information
SymbolDmel\Fmr1Δ50MSpeciesD. melanogaster
NameFlyBase IDFBal0131033
Feature typealleleCreated / Updated2006-08-22/2006-08-22
Associated geneDmel\Fmr1
Allele classamorph, loss of function
MutagenΔ2-3
hide Nature of the Allele
Allele class
Mutagen
Mapped Features and Mutations
Type
Symbol & Location
Additional Notes
References
 
 
 
 
Associated Sequence Data
DDBJ /
EMBL /
GenBank
DNA sequence
Protein sequence
Name
 
UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot
    UniProtKB/TrEMBL
      Progenitor genotype
      Nature of the lesion
      Statement
      Reference
      Deletion removing P{EP} and flanking DNA including the 5' non coding exons and the first coding exon of the Fmr1 gene.
      Assay mode
      Cytology
      hide Phenotypic Data
      hide Phenotypic Class
      hide Phenotype Manifest In
      photoreceptor cell & synapse & lamina receptor cell
      mushroom body & neuron | somatic clone
      mushroom body & neuron & dendrite | somatic clone
      gamma-lobe & neuron | somatic clone
      dorsal cluster neuron & neurite (with Fmr1Δ113M)
      hide Detailed Description
      Statement
      Reference
      Mutants show no morphological defects. When tested for bang sensitivity, temperature sensitivity and phototaxis there is no detectable difference between wild type and mutant. However there are defects in coordination in a simple flight test. Synaptic transmission is reduced (as indicated by a reduction in off-transient mean amplitude as assayed by ERG). Null mutants show pronounced synaptic overgrowth and overelaboration of synaptic terminals. Muscle 4 has 51% increase in number of boutons over controls. Arboreal branching is increased - with muscle 4 showing 50% more branches than wild type. Evoked synaptic transmission at the NMJ is elevated. Mean EJC amplitude is increased. Average synaptic efficacy is upregulated.
      Mutants show a fibre extension defect in the DC and LNv neurons. Extension of DC axons from the lobula to the medulla is incomplete, some axons show guidance errors. LNv neurons may over extend, show guidance defects or show aberrant morphology. The LVn defects are less consistent than those in the DC neurons. Stereotypical grid-like array of neurites entering the medulla is disrupted in mutant flies - short and thin branches fail to connect. This occurs even for neurons that do cross towards the distal medulla. Homozygotes show 0% eclosion from pupal case.
      When mutant female are mated with wild-type males, only 21% of the expected progeny produced. Mutant males have enlarged testes. The diameter of the tip of the testis is similar to controls, but the diameter in the middle of the testis is about 50% larger than wild-type. This phenotype is 100% penetrant in newly enclosed flies, but it abates with aging. Other than this the morphology of mutant testes appears normal. The testis phenotype appears to be caused by the accumulation of misarranged spermatid bundles within the testis lumen. The coiled spermatid bundles normally seen at the testis base are missing in mutants. Instead of mature spermatids, degenerated cell debris fill the base of mutant testes. The early individualisation process of spermatogenesis does appear to progress largely as normal (occasional defects are seen). However, the orientation of spermatid tails within a cyst is often arranged in an irregular fashion in mutants. In addition the configuration of mitochondria and axoneme within a sperm flagellum is variably skewed, as well as some unknown ring structures present at the inner-space between spermatid tails which is not seen in controls. There is also a specific disruption of the microtubule axoneme structure in the sperm flagellum which becomes progressively more pronounced at spermatid differentiation proceeds. The central pair microtubules are missing in mutant axonemes, although the outer microtubules are still present. this phenotype is progressive, 30% of early stage spermatids, and 56% of late-stage spermatid.
      Mutant adults have normal gross brain morphology, including an architecturally normal mushroom body. Mild β lobe overgrowth is seen at a slightly higher frequency than wild type. Single cell mutant clones in the mushroom body (in a wild-type background) produce additional cell body processes compared to wild-type single cell clones (converting the characteristic unipolar mushroom body neurons seen in wild-type into multipolar neurons); there is a 3-fold increase in the number of cell body processes in the mutant cells. The mutant cells show a more complex and disordered dendritic structure compared to wild type; primary dendrites display clear secondary branches and the fine dendritic processes that are normally restricted to the termini spread aberrantly along the primary branches. Single cell mutant γ neurons in the mushroom body always have significantly increased axonal branching and significantly more and longer axonal branches than control cells. The large, extra branches do not follow the main axon trajectory, but instead extend in apparently random directions to invade inappropriate territory. Neurons in large mutant clones in the mushroom body show a significantly enlarged average bouton area and more variable distribution of bouton sizes than wild type. The mutant presynaptic boutons are almost filled with vesicles; the average area of the bouton occupied by vesicles is increased 50% in mutant boutons to nearly 75% of the bouton.
      In just under 10% of homozygous Fmr1[Δ50M] mutants, the β lobe of the mushroom body is misdirected or missing. Just under 20% of homozygous Fmr1[Δ50M] mutants display a misdirected or missing α-lobe. In just under 70%, both the α- and β lobes of the mushroom body are either misdirected or missing. Where the β-lobe is present, just under 10% display severe midline crossing (defined as a densely strained band equal to or greater in width and thickness than those of the adjacent β-lobes), with approximately 25% displaying moderate midline crossing (defined as when the thickness of the fiber bundle crossing the midline is considerable but less than the width of the β-lobe termini). Just under 10% display mild midline crossing phenotypes in the β lobe (defined as when a thin band of fibers cross the midline). Approximately 10% of Fmr1[Δ50M]/Fmr1[Δ113M] transheterozygotes display misdirecting or missing α lobes. Approximately just over 70% of transheterozygous Fmr1[Δ50M]/Fmr1[Δ113M] mutants exhibit severe midline crossing in the β-lobe of the mushroom body (defined as a densely strained band equal to or greater in width and thickness than those of the adjacent β-lobes). The rest appear phenotypically normal. No sexual dimorphism in penetrance or expressivity is found.
      hide Interactions
      hide Phenotypic Class
      hideNOT Enhanced by
      Statement
      Reference
      Fmr1Δ50M has semi-sterile phenotype, non-enhanceable by futschN94
      hideSuppressed by
      Statement
      Reference
      hideNOT suppressed by
      Statement
      Reference
      Fmr1Δ50M has semi-sterile phenotype, non-suppressible by futschN94
      hideNOT Enhancer of
      Statement
      Reference
      hideSuppressor of
      Statement
      Reference
      hideNOT Suppressor of
      Statement
      Reference
      hide Phenotype Manifest In
      hideSuppressed by
      Statement
      Reference
      Fmr1Δ50M has bouton phenotype, suppressible by futschN94
      Fmr1Δ50M has synapse phenotype, suppressible by futschN94
      hideNOT Enhancer of
      Statement
      Reference
      hideSuppressor of
      Statement
      Reference
      Fmr1Δ50M is a suppressor of bouton phenotype of futschN94
      Fmr1Δ50M is a suppressor of synapse phenotype of futschN94
      hideNOT Suppressor of
      Statement
      Reference
      hide Additional Comments
      hide Genetic Interactions
      Statement
      Reference
      hide Xenogenetic Interactions
      Statement
      Reference
      The rough eye phenotype caused by expression of Hsap\MAPTV337M.Scer\UAS under the control of Scer\GAL4GMR.PF is not modified if the flies are also carrying Fmr1Δ50M.
      hide Complementation & Rescue Data
      Comments
      hide Stocks ( 1 )
      Bloomington
      hide Notes on Origin
      Discoverer
      hide Synonyms & Secondary IDs ( 6 )
      Reported As
      Symbol Synonym
      Fmr1Δ50M
       
      Name Synonym
      Secondary FlyBase IDs
        hide References ( 7 )
        Research paper
        Michel et al., 2004, J. Neurosci. 24(25): 5798--5809
        Defective neuronal development in the mushroom bodies of Drosophila Fragile X Mental Retardation 1 Mutants. [FBrf0179339]
        Mutsuddi et al., 2004, Curr. Biol. 14(4): 302--308
        The spinocerebellar ataxia 8 noncoding RNA causes neurodegeneration and associates with staufen in Drosophila. [FBrf0174476]
        Pan et al., 2004, Curr. Biol. 14(20): 1863--1870
        The Drosophila fragile X gene negatively regulates neuronal elaboration and synaptic differentiation. [FBrf0180069]
        Zhang et al., 2004, Dev. Biol. 270(2): 290--307
        The Drosophila fragile X-related gene regulates axoneme differentiation during spermatogenesis. [FBrf0178963]
        Shulman and Feany, 2003, Genetics 165(3): 1233--1242
        Genetic modifiers of tauopathy in Drosophila. [FBrf0167629]
        Morales et al., 2002, Neuron 34(6): 961--972
        Drosophila Fragile X protein, DFXR, regulates neuronal morphology and function in the brain. [FBrf0149142]
        Zhang et al., 2001, Cell 107(5): 591--603
        Drosophila fragile X-related gene regulates the MAP1B homolog Futsch to control synaptic structure and function. [FBrf0141416]