Allele Dmel\sgg^M11

General Information
Symbol	Dmel\sgg^M11	Species	D. melanogaster
Name		FlyBase ID	FBal0032709
Feature type	allele	Created / Updated	2006-08-22/2006-08-22
Associated gene	Dmel\sgg

Allele class	amorph, loss of function
Mutagen	spontaneous
Nature of the Allele
Allele class	amorph (Siegfried et al., 1992, Blair, 1992, Manoukian et al., 1995) loss of function (Greaves et al., 1999)
Mutagen	spontaneous (Perrimon and Smouse, 1989, Blair, 1994)
Mapped Features and Mutations
Type Symbol & Location Additional Notes References
Associated Sequence Data
DDBJ / EMBL / GenBank	DNA sequence Protein sequence Name

UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot
UniProtKB/TrEMBL

Progenitor genotype
Nature of the lesion	Statement Reference
Assay mode
Cytology
Phenotypic Data
Phenotypic Class
	lethal \| maternal effect (Perrimon and Smouse, 1989) lethal \| embryonic stage (Blair, 1992) lethal \| embryonic stage \| rescuable maternal effect (Siegfried et al., 1992) lethal \| embryonic stage \| germ-line clone (Perrimon and Smouse, 1989) visible \| somatic clone (Ahmed et al., 2002, Blair, 1992) locomotor rhythm defective (with sgg³²), with sgg^hs.P (Martinek et al., 2001) locomotor rhythm defective, with sgg^hs.P (Martinek et al., 2001) tissue polarity defective \| cell non-autonomous \| recessive \| somatic clone (Wehrli and Tomlinson, 1998)
Phenotype Manifest In
	denticle belt (Manoukian et al., 1995, Kennerdell and Carthew, 1998) embryonic Malpighian tubule \| germ-line clone (Ainsworth et al., 2000) leg (Wilder and Perrimon, 1995) mesothoracic tarsal bristle longitudinal row 2 (Wilder and Perrimon, 1995) mesothoracic tarsal bristle longitudinal row 3 (Wilder and Perrimon, 1995) mesothoracic tarsal bristle longitudinal row 4 (Wilder and Perrimon, 1995) mesothoracic tarsal bristle longitudinal row 5 (Wilder and Perrimon, 1995) mesothoracic tarsal bristle longitudinal row 6 (Wilder and Perrimon, 1995) mesothoracic tarsal bristle longitudinal row 7 (Wilder and Perrimon, 1995) abdominal 1 ventral denticle belt (Siegfried et al., 1994) abdominal 2 ventral denticle belt (Siegfried et al., 1994) abdominal 3 ventral denticle belt (Siegfried et al., 1994) abdominal 4 ventral denticle belt (Siegfried et al., 1994) abdominal 5 ventral denticle belt (Siegfried et al., 1994) abdominal 6 ventral denticle belt (Siegfried et al., 1994) abdominal 7 ventral denticle belt (Siegfried et al., 1994) macrochaeta & wing (Couso et al., 1994, Duffy et al., 1998) denticle \| germ-line clone \| rescuable maternal effect (Tolwinski et al., 2003) embryonic/first instar larval cuticle \| germ-line clone \| rescuable maternal effect (Tolwinski et al., 2003) embryonic/larval somatic muscle \| germ-line clone (Brennan et al., 1999) stomodeal invagination (Gonzalez-Gaitan and Jaeckle, 1995) midgut constriction 1 \| germ-line clone (Yu et al., 1999) macrochaeta \| ectopic (Duffy et al., 1998) wing \| posterior compartment (Duffy et al., 1998) embryonic/first instar larval cuticle \| germ-line clone \| maternal effect (Perrimon and Smouse, 1989) denticle belt \| germ-line clone \| maternal effect (Perrimon and Smouse, 1989) embryonic head \| germ-line clone \| maternal effect (Perrimon and Smouse, 1989) embryonic/larval spiracle \| germ-line clone \| maternal effect (Perrimon and Smouse, 1989) filzkorper \| germ-line clone \| maternal effect (Perrimon and Smouse, 1989) embryonic peripheral nervous system \| germ-line clone \| maternal effect (Perrimon and Smouse, 1989) embryonic central nervous system \| germ-line clone \| maternal effect (Perrimon and Smouse, 1989) larval brain & embryo \| germ-line clone \| maternal effect (Perrimon and Smouse, 1989) wing \| maternal effect (Perrimon and Smouse, 1989) embryonic/larval dorsal vessel \| precursor (Park et al., 1998) ommatidium \| cell non-autonomous \| somatic clone (Wehrli and Tomlinson, 1998) eye \| somatic clone (Wehrli and Tomlinson, 1998) wing (de Celis and Ruiz-Gomez, 1995) wing \| somatic clone (Ahmed et al., 2002, Blair, 1992) wing margin bristle \| ectopic \| somatic clone (Ahmed et al., 2002) embryonic/first instar larval cuticle (Steitz et al., 1998, Motzny and Holmgren, 1995) wing vein \| ectopic \| somatic clone (Blair, 1992) sensillum campaniformium (Blair, 1992) wing blade \| somatic clone (Takaesu et al., 2005) mechanosensory ventral triple row \| ectopic \| somatic clone (Takaesu et al., 2005)
Detailed Description
	Statement Reference Mutant clones generated via Scer\GAL4^en-e16E and Scer\FLP1^Scer\UAS.cDa acting on P{FRT(w^hs)}101 show ectopic bristles limited to the posterior compartment. (Duffy et al., 1998) Mutant embryos show abnormal guts. (Waltzer and Bienz, 1998) Hemizygous progeny derived from heterozygous females die during early larval stages. All embryos derived from homozygous germline clones die during embryonic development, and have very poorly differentiated cuticle which sometimes has holes in it. The head is defective, with abnormal spiracles, and the filzkorper material is very prominent. The CNS is very disorganised and the brain often protrudes dorsally rather than being covered by epidermis. The PNS is abnormal. Some embryos have a less extreme phenotype, with more cuticle differentiation and some defective denticle belt differentiation. The phenotype can be partially rescued by a paternal copy of wild-type sgg. Homozygous clones in the wing show homeotic transformation of hairs into bristles. (Perrimon and Smouse, 1989) Mutants embryos lacking both maternal and zygotic gene product completely lack ventral denticles: en expression is expanded and there is a strong ectopic wg stripe of expression. Embryos lacking only maternal component have some ventral denticles: en expression is identical to that in the "null" embryos but the ectopic wg stripes are sparse. (Siegfried et al., 1992) Homozygous clones in the wing generally contain dense aggregations of bristles, the type of bristle depending on the location of the clone. The spacing of the normal campaniform sensilla is disrupted if the clone is near the normal location of the sensilla. Ectopic veins are sometimes formed. (Blair, 1992) Embryos lacking both maternal and zygotic sgg and arm function have an embryonic cuticle phenotype like that of arm mutant embryos alone. Embryos lacking maternal sgg and arm but receiving wild type paternal copies develop into normal embryos that survive until adulthood. Embryos lacking maternal sgg and arm but receiving a wild type paternal copy of arm⁺ only, show a sgg naked cuticle phenotype. (Peifer et al., 1994) Embryos derived from homozygous mutant germ lines, receiving neither maternal or zygotic wild type product, lack denticles on the ventral cuticle. (Siegfried et al., 1994) Clones of sgg in the wing blade autonomously differentiate tufts of bristles characteristic of the wing margin. Clones of cells simultaneously mutant for both dsh and sgg do not produce a dsh mutant phenotype at the wing margin, but display the phenotype of cells mutant for sgg alone. (Couso et al., 1994) Clones induced during the late second larval instar give rise to fully ventralized dorsal bristles in both anterior and posterior compartments. (Wilder and Perrimon, 1995) More than wild type numbers of invagination folds in the stomodeal invagination are observed. (Gonzalez-Gaitan and Jaeckle, 1995) Flies lacking both maternal and zygotic sgg have completely naked cuticles, regardless of the dose of ci. (Motzny and Holmgren, 1995) Clones double mutant for sgg^M11 and Df(3R)Espl22 in the anterior wing differentiate anterior bristles (as for clones of sgg^M11 single mutants), however double mutant clones in the posterior compartment differentiate hairs typical of the posterior wing margin. (de Celis and Ruiz-Gomez, 1995) Virtually all ventral denticle belts of the embryo are replaced with naked cuticle. (Manoukian et al., 1995) In paternally rescued embryos the gut constrictions are highly abnormal, all three are condensed and folded up into one giant constriction. Malpighian tubule growth is precociously initiated. Homozygous embryos also exhibit precocious development, but are severely misshapen so morphological analysis is difficult. (Yu et al., 1996) Embryos show severe segmentation defects but no increase (but rather a moderate decrease) in heart precursor formation. (Park et al., 1996) No effect on the faf eye phenotype. (Huang and Fischer-Vize, 1996) Homozygous clones induced in the eye produce scars. Outside the scarred area, ommatidial chirality is inverted on the polar side of the clone. This phenotype is unchanged if the clone is also homozygous for wg^l-17. (Wehrli and Tomlinson, 1998) Embryos zygotically and maternally mutant for sgg^M11 show reduction in the number of heart precursors. sgg^M11 dsh⁷⁵ double mutant embryos have the same phenotype as sgg^M11 single mutant embryos. (Park et al., 1998) Females with homozygous germ line clones, mated to wild-type males, give rise to 2 classes of embryos: null sgg^M11/Y embryos (lacking both maternal and zygotic sgg function) which have a completely naked cuticle and paternally rescued sgg^M11/+ embryos (lacking maternal sgg function) which have sparse denticles. These phenotypes are rescued to an almost wild-type denticle pattern by sgg^Scer\UAS.cSa expressed under the control of Scer\GAL4^69B. (Steitz et al., 1998) Embryos do not form ventral denticles. (Kennerdell and Carthew, 1998) slou-expressing muscles are often absent in embryos derived from homozygous germline clones. (Brennan et al., 1999) In embryos derived from germ line clones, the anterior midgut construction is obliterated. Phenotype is similar to that caused by Apc2 RNAi mutants. (Yu et al., 1999) Homozygous sgg^M11 or sgg³²/sgg^M11 adults (that have been rescued to adulthood by the addition of sgg^hs.P coupled with larval and pupal heatshocks), show a lengthening of the locomotor activity rhythm periodicity to about 26 hours. (Martinek et al., 2001) Homozygous clones in the wing show transformations of wing blade to wing margin tissue. (Ahmed et al., 2002) Mutant stage 17 embryos do not show significant defects in the location or formation of the tracheal dorsal trunk branch, dorsal branch 10, spiracular branch 10 or the posterior spiracle. (Takaesu et al., 2002) Extra Malpighian tubule cells are specified in sgg^M11 embryos dervied from sgg^M11 germ-line clones. (Ainsworth et al., 2000) No denticle are present in the cuticles made by embryos maternally and zygotically mutant for sgg^M11. (Tolwinski et al., 2003) sgg[M11] mutant wing blade clones exhibit thin mechanosensory bristles. Ectopic bristles can be generated anywhere on the wing blade by sgg[M11] mutant clones. (Takaesu et al., 2005)
Interactions
	Show the genetic interaction network for Enhancers & Suppressors
Phenotypic Class
Enhancer of
Statement Reference sgg^M11/sgg[+] is an enhancer of visible phenotype of Scer\GAL4^en-e16E, arm^Scer\UAS.cWa (Greaves et al., 1999) sgg^M11 is an enhancer of visible phenotype of Scer\GAL4^GMR.PF, arm^Scer\UAS.cWa (Greaves et al., 1999)
NOT Enhancer of
Statement Reference sgg^M11 is a non-enhancer of visible phenotype of Scer\GAL4^bbg-C96, mam^N.Scer\UAS (Helms et al., 1999)
Suppressor of
Statement Reference sgg^M11/sgg[+] is a suppressor of visible phenotype of Scer\GAL4^en-e16E, arm^Scer\UAS.cWa (Greaves et al., 1999) sgg^M11 is a suppressor of visible phenotype of Scer\GAL4^en-e16E, argos::shg^{i.Scer\UAS.T:Hsap\MYC} (Greaves et al., 1999) sgg^M11 is a suppressor of visible phenotype of Scer\GAL4^GMR.PF, argos::shg^{i.Scer\UAS.T:Hsap\MYC} (Greaves et al., 1999) sgg^M11 is a suppressor of visible phenotype of Scer\GAL4^69B, fz^Scer\UAS.N (Zhang and Carthew, 1998) sgg^M11 is a suppressor of visible phenotype of Scer\GAL4^unspecified, nkd^Scer\UAS.cZa (Zeng et al., 2000)
NOT Suppressor of
Statement Reference sgg^M11 is a non-suppressor of lethal \| larval stage \| segment polarity \| germ-line clone phenotype of lgs^20F (Kramps et al., 2002)
Phenotype Manifest In
Suppressed by
Statement Reference sgg^M11 has denticle belt \| rescuable maternal effect \| germ-line clone phenotype, suppressible \| rescuable maternal effect by arm⁸ (Tolwinski et al., 2003) sgg^M11 has embryonic/first instar larval cuticle \| rescuable maternal effect \| germ-line clone phenotype, suppressible \| partially \| rescuable maternal effect by arm⁸ (Tolwinski et al., 2003) sgg^M11 has embryonic/first instar larval cuticle \| rescuable maternal effect \| germ-line clone phenotype, suppressible \| partially \| rescuable maternal effect by arm^F1α (Tolwinski et al., 2003) sgg^M11 has denticle belt \| rescuable maternal effect \| germ-line clone phenotype, suppressible \| rescuable maternal effect by arm^F1α (Tolwinski et al., 2003)
NOT suppressed by
Statement Reference sgg^M11 has denticle belt phenotype, non-suppressible by fz^a.374-2360/fz2^L.cKa/fz2^a.L.cKa/fz^374-2360 (Kennerdell and Carthew, 1998) sgg^M11 has abdominal 1 ventral denticle belt phenotype, non-suppressible by dsh³ (Siegfried et al., 1994) sgg^M11 has abdominal 2 ventral denticle belt phenotype, non-suppressible by dsh³ (Siegfried et al., 1994) sgg^M11 has abdominal 3 ventral denticle belt phenotype, non-suppressible by dsh³ (Siegfried et al., 1994) sgg^M11 has abdominal 4 ventral denticle belt phenotype, non-suppressible by dsh³ (Siegfried et al., 1994) sgg^M11 has abdominal 5 ventral denticle belt phenotype, non-suppressible by dsh³ (Siegfried et al., 1994) sgg^M11 has abdominal 6 ventral denticle belt phenotype, non-suppressible by dsh³ (Siegfried et al., 1994) sgg^M11 has abdominal 7 ventral denticle belt phenotype, non-suppressible by dsh³ (Siegfried et al., 1994) sgg^M11 has abdominal 1 ventral denticle belt phenotype, non-suppressible by por^PB16 (Siegfried et al., 1994) sgg^M11 has abdominal 2 ventral denticle belt phenotype, non-suppressible by por^PB16 (Siegfried et al., 1994) sgg^M11 has abdominal 3 ventral denticle belt phenotype, non-suppressible by por^PB16 (Siegfried et al., 1994) sgg^M11 has abdominal 4 ventral denticle belt phenotype, non-suppressible by por^PB16 (Siegfried et al., 1994) sgg^M11 has abdominal 5 ventral denticle belt phenotype, non-suppressible by por^PB16 (Siegfried et al., 1994) sgg^M11 has abdominal 6 ventral denticle belt phenotype, non-suppressible by por^PB16 (Siegfried et al., 1994) sgg^M11 has abdominal 7 ventral denticle belt phenotype, non-suppressible by por^PB16 (Siegfried et al., 1994)
Enhancer of
Statement Reference sgg^M11/sgg[+] is an enhancer of wing sensillum \| ectopic phenotype of Scer\GAL4^en-e16E, arm^Scer\UAS.cWa (Greaves et al., 1999) sgg^M11 is an enhancer of eye phenotype of Scer\GAL4^GMR.PF, arm^Scer\UAS.cWa (Greaves et al., 1999) sgg^M11 is an enhancer of larval midgut & embryo phenotype of nej³ (Waltzer and Bienz, 1998)
NOT Enhancer of
Statement Reference sgg^M11 is a non-enhancer of denticle \| germ-line clone \| ectopic phenotype of arm² (Tolwinski and Wieschaus, 2004)
Suppressor of
Statement Reference sgg^M11/sgg[+] is a suppressor of scutellar bristle phenotype of Scer\GAL4^ap-md544, nmo^{c5-1.Scer\UAS} (Zeng and Verheyen, 2004) sgg^M11/sgg[+] is a suppressor of scutum & macrochaeta phenotype of Scer\GAL4^ap-md544, nmo^{c5-1.Scer\UAS} (Zeng and Verheyen, 2004) sgg^M11/sgg[+] is a suppressor \| partially of wing phenotype of Scer\GAL4^ap-md544, nmo^{c5-1.Scer\UAS} (Zeng and Verheyen, 2004) sgg^M11/sgg[+] is a suppressor of wing margin phenotype of Scer\GAL4^sd-SG29.1, nmo^{c5-1.Scer\UAS} (Zeng and Verheyen, 2004) sgg^M11/sgg[+] is a suppressor of wing vein \| ectopic phenotype of Scer\GAL4^en-e16E, arm^Scer\UAS.cWa (Greaves et al., 1999) sgg^M11 is a suppressor of wing phenotype of Scer\GAL4^en-e16E, argos::shg^{i.Scer\UAS.T:Hsap\MYC} (Greaves et al., 1999) sgg^M11 is a suppressor of eye phenotype of Scer\GAL4^GMR.PF, argos::shg^{i.Scer\UAS.T:Hsap\MYC} (Greaves et al., 1999) sgg^M11 is a suppressor \| germ-line clone \| maternal effect \| partially of embryonic leading edge cell \| maternal effect \| germ-line clone phenotype of dsh³ (Morel and Arias, 2004) sgg^M11 is a suppressor \| germ-line clone \| maternal effect \| partially of embryonic/first instar larval cuticle \| maternal effect \| germ-line clone phenotype of dsh³ (Morel and Arias, 2004) sgg^M11 is a suppressor \| somatic clone of macrochaeta phenotype of N^{ECNΔ10-12.Scer\UAS}, Scer\GAL4^ptc-559.1 (Brennan et al., 1999) sgg^M11 is a suppressor \| somatic clone of proneural cluster & dorsal mesothoracic disc phenotype of N^{ECNΔ10-12.Scer\UAS}, Scer\GAL4^ptc-559.1 (Brennan et al., 1999) sgg^M11 is a suppressor of dorsal mesothoracic disc \| ectopic phenotype of Pka-C1^E95, smo³ (Price and Kalderon, 2002)
NOT Suppressor of
Statement Reference sgg^M11 is a non-suppressor of denticle \| germ-line clone \| ectopic phenotype of arm² (Tolwinski and Wieschaus, 2004) sgg^M11 is a non-suppressor of mesothoracic tergum \| ectopic phenotype of Pka-C1^E95, smo³ (Price and Kalderon, 2002)
Other
Statement Reference arm²/arm^S8, sgg^M11 has cuticle \| germ-line clone phenotype (Tolwinski and Wieschaus, 2004) arm², arm^S8, sgg^M11 has cuticle \| germ-line clone phenotype (Tolwinski and Wieschaus, 2004)
Additional Comments
Genetic Interactions
Statement Reference Suppresses wing margin phenotype of fz^Scer\UAS.N, Scer\GAL4^69B. (Zhang and Carthew, 1998) Embryos doubly mutant for sgg^M11 and dsh³ or por^PB16 also lack denticles on the ventral cuticle. Embryos doubly mutant for sgg^M11 and arm⁸ display the ventral cuticle covered with denticles. (Siegfried et al., 1994) Double mutants for sgg^M11 and nej³ show a worse gut phenotype than do nej³ single mutants. (Waltzer and Bienz, 1998) The sgg^M11 lack of denticles phenotype is not affected by injection of both dsRNA produced by annealing fz^374-2360 and fz^a.374-2360 RNA and dsRNA produced by annealing fz2^L.cKa and fz2^a.L.cKa RNA. (Kennerdell and Carthew, 1998) Has no effect on the wing nicking phenotype seen in mam^N.Scer\UAS, Scer\GAL4^C96 flies. (Helms et al., 1999) sgg^M11 somatic clones, in a N^{ECNΔ10-12.Scer\UAS}/Scer\GAL4^ptc-559.1 background, suppress the loss of proneural precursors and sensory organ phenotypes normally seen in these flies. (Brennan et al., 1999) Pka-C1^E95, sgg^M11 smo³ triple mutant clones in the wing disc exhibit some outgrowths from the notum but no significant wing pattern duplications. (Price and Kalderon, 2002) lgs^20F, sgg^M11 homozygous mutant germ-line clones can made by rescuing homozygous mothers with P{αTub84B(FRT.lgs.sgg)Scer\GAL4.B} and FLPing out sgg^mR10 and lgs^αTub84B.PK (Which are surrounded by FRT sites). When this is done, the phenotype of the animals is indistinguishable from lgs^20F germ-line clones. (Kramps et al., 2002) The loss of denticle belts in the cuticle made by sgg^M11/sgg^M11 maternal/zygotic mutant embryos, is suppressed by maternal/zygotic arm^F1α/arm^F1α (a weaker suppression is seen when arm⁸ is used instead). When these double mutant embryos are also zygotically mutant for wg^l-8, they make little naked cuticle, a phenotype approximating to that seen in wg^l-8 mutants. The appearance of the denticle lawn in these embryos is noticeably different to that seen in maternal/zygotic arm^F1α/arm^F1α embryos zygotically mutant for wg^l-8. The denticle belts formed in sgg^M11; arm^F1α maternal/zygotic double mutant embryos are largely suppressed by Axn^S044230/Axn^S044230, leaving mainly naked cuticle without much sign of periodic character. The periodic character of the cuticles made by sgg^M11; arm⁸ maternal/zygotic double mutant embryos is suppressed by arr²/arr², with the resulting cuticle tending toward denticle cell fates. (Tolwinski et al., 2003) The addition of sgg^M11 has no effect on the arm² embryonic phenotype. However the combination of arm², arm^S8 and sgg^M11 leads to embryos with naked cuticle. (Tolwinski and Wieschaus, 2004) Notching of the distal wing margin in nmo^{c5-1.Scer\UAS}; Scer\GAL4^sd-SG29.1 flies is completely suppressed by sgg^M11/+. Loss of notum macrochaetae in nmo^{c5-1.Scer\UAS}; Scer\GAL4^ap-md544 flies is suppressed by sgg^M11/+ and enhanced by Axn^A2.Scer\UAS, leading to the loss of all scutellar bristles. Severe blistering of the wing in nmo^{c5-1.Scer\UAS}; Scer\GAL4^ap-md544 flies is suppressed by sgg^M11/+, resulting in almost wild-type wings. (Zeng and Verheyen, 2004) Unlike embryos from dsh³ germline clones, embryos from dsh³; sgg^M11 germ-line clones have no dorsal hole in their cuticles (although their dorsal cuticle is severely puckered), and have a dorso-ventrally polarised and extended leading edge at stage 13. (Morel and Arias, 2004)
Xenogenetic Interactions
Statement Reference
Complementation & Rescue Data
Rescued by	sgg^M11 is rescued by sgg^mR10 (Ruel et al., 1993) sgg^M11 is rescued by sgg^A.hs (Siegfried et al., 1992)
Partially rescued by	sgg^M11 is partially rescued by sgg^Scer\UAS.cSa/Scer\GAL4^69B (Steitz et al., 1998)
Comments	sgg^mR10 rescues hemizygous males to viable and (poorly) fertile adults. (Ruel et al., 1993)
Stocks ( 0 )

Notes on Origin
Discoverer

Comments
	Strong sgg allele. (Cadigan and Nusse, 1996)
Synonyms & Secondary IDs ( 12 )
Reported As
Symbol Synonym	sgg³³ sgg^M11-1 (Shirras and Couso, 1996, Gonzalez-Gaitan and Jaeckle, 1995, Couso et al., 1994, Ruel et al., 1993, Siegfried et al., 1992) sgg^m11.1 (de Celis and Ruiz-Gomez, 1995) sgg^m11 (Brennan et al., 1999, Brennan et al., 1999, Blair, 1992, Hayward et al., 2005) sgg^M11 sgg^MX11 (Gallet et al., 1999) sgg<up>zw3 M11-1</up> (Ruel et al., 1999) zw3/sgg^m11 (Leviten and Posakony, 1996) zw3^M11-1 (Tolwinski and Wieschaus, 2004, Tolwinski et al., 2003, Ahmed et al., 2002, Tolwinski and Wieschaus, 2001, Freeman and Bienz, 2001, Yu et al., 1999, Helms et al., 1999, Kennerdell and Carthew, 1998, Steitz et al., 1998, Pai et al., 1997, Huang and Fischer-Vize, 1996, Yu et al., 1996, Motzny and Holmgren, 1995, Peifer et al., 1994, Siegfried et al., 1994, Peifer et al., 1994, Perrimon and Smouse, 1989) zw3^m11-1 (Price and Kalderon, 2002) zw3^m11 (Zeng and Verheyen, 2004, Zhang and Carthew, 1998, Blair, 1994) zw3^M11 (Ainsworth et al., 2000, Nakagoshi et al., 2002, Takaesu et al., 2002, Zeng et al., 2000, Greaves et al., 1999, Yu et al., 1998, Waltzer and Bienz, 1998, Duffy et al., 1998, Cadigan et al., 1998, Park et al., 1998, Cadigan and Nusse, 1996, Park et al., 1996, Manoukian et al., 1995, Wilder and Perrimon, 1995, Takaesu et al., 2005)
Name Synonym
Secondary FlyBase IDs

References ( 56 )

Generate a list of	All references relating to this allele ( 56 )

List References by type	Research paper ( 55 ) Review ( 1 )
Recent research papers (0)
	All research papers listed in FlyBase were published before 2006 Show research papers ...
Recent reviews (0)
	All reviews listed in FlyBase were published before 2006 Show reviews ...

Allele Dmel\sggM11

Allele Dmel\sgg^M11